Asian Loan Bankers Leave Dubai Conference With “Split Screen” View Of Gulf Risk

Just weeks after celebrating record Gulf deal flows at a high‑profile Dubai conference, Asia’s loan bankers are going home with more sober assessments of risk and a “split screen” view of the region’s future as a funding destination. Bloomberg reports that on the sidelines of a m

Sophie Aldridge

By

Sophie Aldridge

Published

Mar 16, 2026

Read

2 min

Asian Loan Bankers Leave Dubai Conference With “Split Screen” View Of Gulf Risk

Just weeks after celebrating record Gulf deal flows at a high‑profile Dubai conference, Asia’s loan bankers are going home with more sober assessments of risk and a “split screen” view of the region’s future as a funding destination.

Bloomberg reports that on the sidelines of a major Asia‑Pacific loan‑market gathering last week, private conversations were dominated by a single topic: how the Iran war has rattled enthusiasm for the Middle East. That mood marked a sharp reversal from late January, when the Asia Pacific Loan Market Association held its first‑ever conference in Dubai with roughly 300 attendees—about half flying in from outside the region—to explore new Gulf opportunities.

In 2025, Asian and Chinese banks extended more than 15 billion dollars in loans to the Gulf, triple the prior year, with most funds going to Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The Straits Times notes that this made Asian lenders the Gulf’s top financiers, supplanting some European competitors. Bankers spoke of “Gulf goals” and multi‑year pipelines tied to giga‑projects, energy transition and logistics.

Now, Bloomberg says, at least one major Singaporean bank has shelved its Middle East expansion plans for 2026, while several Chinese and Japanese lenders have paused or slowed new deal approvals pending clearer risk guidance. Conversations have shifted from market‑share ambitions to exposure maps, covenant strength and political‑risk insurance.

Business Times coverage summarises the dilemma: on one hand, Gulf sovereigns and GREs remain fundamentally strong credits with vast project pipelines and increasingly sophisticated markets; on the other, the conflict has punctured assumptions of a “low‑beta” Gulf, raising questions over how to price and structure risk.

Rather than an abrupt retreat, loan bankers talk of a repricing and “scenario‑based selectivity.” Deals tied to essential infrastructure, regulated utilities or strongly guaranteed sovereign projects may still attract Asian participation, albeit at wider spreads and with tighter terms. More speculative projects or unsecured corporate borrowing look set to face higher hurdles.

For Gulf issuers, this split‑screen reality—buoyant long‑term fundamentals vs. higher perceived event risk—could accelerate a pivot toward bond markets, local‑currency funding and diversified investor bases that include both Asia and the West. For Asian banks, it will push risk management and geopolitical analysis higher up the decision ladder, ensuring the next phase of Asia–Gulf financial integration is shaped as much by downside planning as by growth narratives.

Sophie Aldridge

Written by

Sophie Aldridge

Senior correspondent · Banking & Capital Markets

Sophie spent a decade on a debt capital markets desk before swapping the trade for the typewriter. She covers banks, regulators, and the underwriting decisions most readers never see. Sharpest on fixed income and balance-sheet stress; partial to central bankers who pick up the phone. Based in Riyadh. Reach out at sophie.aldridge@theplatinumcapital.com.